| Q1. |
How safe is our Product? |
|
|
|
All our beverages meet Indian as well as international standards of product safety and quality. Our products are regularly tested at independent national and international laboratories such as VIMTA (Hyderabad) for Product Water / Sugar Syrup/ Packaged Drinking Water, MWH Laboratories (California, USA) for Packaged Drinking Water and CSL, a world-leading UK government laboratory in London for finished beverages. These are amongst the few laboratories in the world which have the required ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation for pesticide residues testing (which is in the process of validating its methodology).
|
|
|
|
|
| Q2. |
What are Pesticides? |
|
|
|
Pesticides are substances commonly used in agriculture for preventing, destroying, attracting, repelling, or controlling any pest including unwanted species of plants or animals during the production, storage, transport, distribution, and processing of food, agricultural commodities, or animal feeds.
Various pesticides are known as insecticides, nematicides, fungicides, herbicides, and rodenticides, i.e., agents primarily effective against insects, nematodes (or roundworms), fungi, weeds, and rodents, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
| Q3. |
What are Maximum Residue Levels (MRLs)? |
|
|
|
Crops treated with pesticides may contain remnants of the spray when they are sold in the market. These remnants may pose unacceptable health risk if consumed. Regulators determine the amount of residue that can be safely consumed and this is legally established as a maximum residue limit (MRL) under the Food and Drugs Act (FDA).
The MRL is the maximum concentration (in ppm or ppb) of a pesticide residue that is legally permitted in, or on a food commodity.
MRLs are set at levels which would result in consumption of any residue at a level substantially lower than the Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) for pesticide residues.
MRLs are set:
• Based on scientific data
• After confirming their safety to consumers
• When validated analytical methods are available to monitor and enforce compliance.
|
|
|
|
|
| Q4. |
How are Pesticide Residue Limits established?
|
|
|
|
The approval for use of any pesticide in a country is subject to its safety evaluation. Safety levels for any pesticide are calculated over a number of formal assessments. The Codex Alimentarius Commission is an international body which sets international guidelines on many elements of food safety, including pesticide residues on food.
|
|
|
|
|
| Q5. |
What is Acceptable Daily Intake? |
|
|
|
The ADI for any given pesticide is a measure of the quantity of a particular chemical in food that can be consumed daily over a lifetime without any known risk to health. It is expressed in relation to bodyweight.
One of the most important tools in the safety evaluation of pesticide use on food is the calculation of what is an Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI).
|
Pesticides
|
ADI,
mg/ kg/ body weight
|
ADI,
%
|
|
Alorin & dieldrin
BHC
Carberyl
Carbofuran
Chlorpyrifos
Cyhalothrin
Cypermethrin
DDT
Dicrotophos
Dimethoate
Endosulfan
Fenvalerate
Heptachlor
Lindane
Malathion
Methamidophos
Methomyl
Mevinphos
Monocrotophos
Parathion
Parathion-mehtyl
Permethrin
Profenofos
|
0.0001
NAa
0.003
0.002
0.01
0.002
0.05
0.02
NA
0.004
0.006
0.02
0.0001
0.001
0.3
0.004
0.03
0.0008
0.0006
0.004
0.003
0.05
0.01
|
5
-
0.4
0.25
0.01
0.2
0.1
0.21
-
1.05
1.6
0.01
7
0.1
<0.01
6.38
0.05
0.25
2
0.02
0.43
<0.01
0.2
|
*NA = ADI not available from WHO.
ADIs and percentages of the ADI based on the highest
daily intakes of Thais (Asians), extracted from Vongbudohapitak
et al, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
| Q6. |
How is ADI established? |
|
|
|
ADI is derived by first conducting diet trials on laboratory animals and observing the maximum level of pesticide residue that can be consumed without any visible effects. This level expressed as percentage of body weight is known as the No Observable Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL or NOEL). The animals are tested for risks like birth defects, cancer, reproductive changes, damage to the nervous system, harm to organs such as the kidney or liver, and many other measurable health indicators.
These results in an ADI for humans which is 100 times lower than the
NOAEL consumption rate established from trials on laboratory
animals.
|
|
|
|
|
| Q7. |
Do you add pesticides in your products? |
|
|
|
No,
Our processes actually remove pesticide residues from ingredients to
comply with prevalent standards.
India’s
economy is driven majorly by agriculture, pesticides are used
extensively in agriculture and health control activities like mass
application to control spread of malaria, dengue etc. These
pesticides find their way into the food chain due to run-off from the
application site to ground water streams and surface water bodies,
and also on the food commodities by the virtue of application.
The sugar used in all Coca-Cola products is obtained from sugar mills
specially selected after meticulous screening. At Coca-Cola in India,
the sugar is put through a specially developed ‘Hot Carbon
Treatment process’ which ensures that the sugar syrup is
safe in all aspects.
The flavours used in our products also meet all
safety specifications as required by FEMA (Flavour and Extract
Manufacturers Association). All food additives in the flavours and
flavourings have been approved for use by the Central Committee for
Food Standards (CCFS) of the Government of India, and are based on
standards recommended by the Joint FAO / WHO Expert Committee.
Water used in the manufacture of all Coca-Cola products undergo a
rigorous multiple barrier filtration process to eliminate pesticide
residues, other organic and inorganic impurities that are normally
present in water. This process ensures that the water used:
meets
the specifications prescribed by the PFA, and
meets
the BIS standard for Packaged Drinking Water viz., IS 14543:2004.
The BIS standard for pesticide residues is similar to the world’s
most stringent standards, viz., that of the European Union.
Our products comply with applicable stringent national regulations as
well as international norms for pesticide residues to deliver a safe
product for consumption.
|
|
|
|
|
| Q8. |
Why should we drink your product if they are of no nutritional value?
|
|
|
|
Our
products meet different needs of consumers: Hydration, Replenishment,
Fun, Nutrition etc. The consumers can choose from our range of
beverages i.e. water, Carbonated Soft Drink (CSD), Juices, Tea &
Coffee, low calorie beverages based on their need.
About
80 percent of people's total water comes from drinking water and
beverages and the other 20 percent are derived from food.
Moreover, our products, sweetened with sugar, provide ready carbohydrates for instant energy. In spite of our nutritional contributions, we market our products simply as a source of refreshment. Consumers wishing to control their ///calorie///intake can also choose from our range of low-calorie beverages.
According to most nutrition experts, the best way to ensure that you follow a good diet is to eat a variety of foods in moderation.
|
|
|
|
|
| Q9. |
Why are our results different for those reported by an NGO?
|
|
|
|
The key reasons for differences in testing results are:
1)
Accreditation of the laboratory -- Although the NGO laboratory is
ISO9000 certified, which means it has quality systems, but it doesn’t
have the required ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation to ensure that it has
the capability to consistently generate reproducible results. All
the laboratories where we test our products in India or abroad have
been certified against ISO 17025 standard.
2) The equipment that is used – It is essential to separate the pesticide residues from other substances in the product so that individual pesticide residues can be identified. This is possible only if the equipment used has the capability to correctly isolate these pesticide residues. Otherwise it can generate false results. The equipment used by the NGO laboratory lacks the capability for generating accurate results.
3) The
testing methodology that is used -- There are issues with the sample
preparation and extraction of potential contaminants out of the
multi-component matrix of a soft drink. This will be prone to
generating false results and incorrect interpretations.
After
reviewing the NGO adopted methodologies, these laboratories which
regularly test our products have outlined the probable causes for
these differences. Read More….
•
The methods used to test our finished products have been developed by
the Company and Central Science Laboratory (CSL), an UK government
laboratory.
•
Although the validation of these methods has not been completed, they
represent the state of the art in terms of procedure and technology.
•
CSL runs an international program to test the proficiency of
laboratories in analysis, including pesticide residues.
|
|
|
|
|
| Q10. |
What is Accreditation? Why does Coca-Cola company tests its products in only accredited laboratories? What is the difference between ISO 17025 accredited and ISO 9001 certified laboratory? |
|
|
|
An
Accredited laboratory ensures “tested once and accepted
everywhere” whereas an ISO 9001 certified laboratory does not
itself demonstrate the competence of the laboratory to produce
technically valid data and results.
Testing
through an accredited laboratory is preferred over a non - accredited one because it minimizes the risk of unreliable results
which, in turn, reduces the risk for manufacturers or suppliers to
produce or supply a faulty product.
An ISO
17025 accredited laboratory also has their laboratory staff
calibrated so that they can deliver reliable results each time and
every time which may not be true with an ISO 9001 certified
laboratory.
Finally,
an ISO 17025 accredited laboratory has minimized chances of
retesting over ISO 9001 certified laboratory
The Government of India has authorized NABL as the sole accreditation body for
Testing and Calibration laboratories in this country which certifies
the laboratories against ISO 17025 standard.
All
the laboratories where we test our products in India and abroad have
been certified against ISO 17025 standard.
|
|
|
|
|
| Q11. |
What is a validated Method? |
|
|
|
Validation of method is the planned and documented procedure to
establish its performance characteristics. The performance
characteristics or the validation parameters of the method determine
the suitability of its intended use.
A method is validated when it generates results that are accurate, precise and
specific each time and every time.
|
|
|
|
|
| Q12. |
Have you slowed down the notification of the proposed standards as stated by the NGO? |
|
|
|
We as a company have always supported the need for science-based
criteria for pesticide residues in foods. The major issue in roll-out
of such standard is non–availability of a validated test
method. Without a sound testing method, standard cannot be enforced.
We are working with the Indian government, trade bodies, NGOs,
scientists to develop a sound; validated testing protocol and have
sponsored project at CSL, London to develop a protocol that can be
shared worldwide including the Government of India.
|
|
|
|
|
| Q13. |
Why do you use an overseas laboratory? Are the Indian laboratories not good enough? |
|
|
|
We use
a combination of laboratories in India as well as around the world.
1. VIMTA
(India) www.vimta.com
for water/sugar syrup/packaged drinking water
2. MWH
laboratories www.mwhlabs.com
(California, U.S.) for packaged drinking water
3.
Central Science Laboratories (London, U.K),www.csl.gov.uk
a world-renowned and independent laboratory, for finished products
4. Our
own internal laboratories at all our manufacturing locations.
We always
have and continue to test our products at world's most highly
respected laboratories, with a specific expertise in pesticide
residue analysis, to ensure our products are safe for consumption.
|
|
|
|
|
| Q14. |
Why do we use the
European Union (EU) criteria? Is the Indian standard not strong
enough?
|
|
|
|
The Coca-Cola Quality
System adopts the most stringent standard available. The EU criteria
for pesticide residues in bottled water are currently the most
stringent in the world.
|
|
|
|
|
| Q15. |
How can you have reliable analyses of pesticide residues in finished products when you say that a validated methodology is still being developed? |
|
|
|
While the validation of these methods has not been completed, they employ the best in terms of procedure and technology. Our experts are confident that these methods produce the most accurate and reliable results possible.
The
test results that we refer to were obtained using the best, most
advanced test methods available for the detection of pesticide
residues in beverages that contain many ingredients. The Company and
one of the world's top laboratories, CSL, have both been working to
develop these methods. Read More….
|