On April 7, 2005, the High Court in Kerala
rendered a favourable decision for the Coca-Cola Company allowing us to re-open
the plant and also to resume our use of local groundwater for plant operations.
The Court’s ruling was on the merits and disposed of all points of contest.
The
dispute before the High Court primarily involved two (2) issues:
The Court determined both issues in favor
of the Company.
Local License to Operate:
The High Court
found that the Panchayat acted arbitrarily and was not justified
in revoking the Kerala plants local license to operate. The Court based
its decision, among other things, on the fact that the Panchayat made its decision
without the benefit of any scientific review of the Kerala plants actual
impact on the local aquifer. The Court also determined that the Panchayat was
not authorized nor expert enough to consider allegations that Company biosolids
or wastewater sludge are contaminants to local land, or that Company products
in India contain pesticide residues. Such issues properly reside with other Indian
government agencies.
The High Court therefore ordered the Panchayat
to properly consider a plant application for renewal of its local license to operate,
provided that the plant applies for the same within two weeks of the
Courts decision. Our local India office has made this application this week.
In addition, the Court ordered the Panchayat to grant us a license to operate
the Kerala plant if we obtain a Factories Act license and clearance
from the [Kerala State] Pollution Control Board. We are already in possession
of both.
Withdrawal/Usage of Local Groundwater:
The High
Court further found that the Companys Kerala beverage plant is not negatively
affecting the local aquifer and that we have the right to withdraw and use local
groundwater for our operations. The Court relied heavily on the expert scientific
report (which we gave you) which was commissioned by an earlier court ruling that
concluded the above as well. The Court stated: We find that the report of
the Committee is fair, it appears to be authentic, based on data collected, mature
and therefore acceptable. The Court also appeared to be significantly influenced
by the fact that local groundwater wells continued to dry up although the Kerala
plant ceased operations some time ago.
The High Court found that a
private person, including a company, has the right under Indian law to extract
groundwater from underneath his or her property within reasonable limits,
unless prohibited or otherwise restricted by statute. In India, to date, there
is no statutory prohibition or restriction on withdrawal or use of groundwater.
Consistent
with the expert report, the High Court determined that the cause of the water
shortage in the local Kerala area was reduced rainfall during the last several
years, not the Companys Kerala plant. The Court therefore ordered that the
Kerala plant may withdraw and use up to 500,000 liters of water per day during
2005-06, again consistent with the findings of the expert panel and accounting
for less than 5% of total available groundwater in the local area. To date, maximum
groundwater usage at the Kerala plant has not exceeded 460,000 liters per day.
As expected, the Court further found that in future years, the Kerala plant may
be required to extract and use less groundwater if there is reduced rainfall in
a particular year.
Finally, and of interest, the High Court directed
the Company to be actively involved in community development programs for
the people residing in the locality, especially in the matter of health and drinking
water supply. The Courts rationale for ordering this is the general
public apprehension about the shortage of drinking water. The Companys
involvement is be supervised by the local Panchayat. Currently, the Company is
actively involved with the community by means of providing tanker loads of drinking
water, as well as assisting with rainwater harvesting programs, health camps etc.
| www.makeeverydropcount.com | www.myenjoyzone.com | www.coca-cola.com | www.cokefacts.org | ||
|